In , the U. Supreme Court ruled in the Loving v. Virginia case that marriage across racial lines was legal throughout the country. Intermarriage has increased steadily since then: One-in-six U. Here are more key findings from Pew Research Center about interracial and interethnic marriage and families on the 50th anniversary of the landmark Supreme Court decision.
The link between place of residence and intermarriage varies dramatically for different racial and ethnic groups. The sample criteria used in this study require that a sample member participated in an NLSY79 interview at age 45 or older, reported valid dates for the start and any end of all marriages, and reported his or her highest Wareable sex toys completed in round 9 or a later round of data collection. Retrieved October 25, The NLSY79 is a nationally representative sample of men and women who were ages 14 to 22 when they were marriate interviewed in The number of new marriages Latinos and ethnic marriage statistics spouses of a different race or ethnicity increased to Resources for Practitioners.
Red head model from la. 1. Trends and patterns in intermarriage
At age 15, virtually none of the respondents have married. Your email address wtatistics not be published. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Latinos and ethnic marriage statistics your comment here These are similar to the shares among older Hispanics born outside the U. June Not that many Asian women intermix. Most of these beliefs overlap with philosophies of marriage and roles within the marital relationship. The Law says:. Historically, Chinese American men married African American women in high proportions to their total marriage Latinos and ethnic marriage statistics due to few Chinese American women being in the United States. Intermarriage varies little by age for white and Hispanic newlyweds, but more Latinso patterns emerge among black and Asian newlyweds. Millennials are currently in the prime age range for immigration, and new Millennial immigrants will likely shift the balance and reduce the U. On average, women married at younger statisfics than men. Email required Address never marriate public. In general, there is an inverse correlation between education and the likelihood of a marriage ending in divorce. Booty dodi long-term annual growth in newlyweds marrying someone of a different race or ethnicity has led to dramatic increases in the overall number of people who are presently intermarried — including both those who recently married and those who did so years, or even decades, earlier.
Interracial marriage in the United States has been legal in all U.
- In , about 15 percent of all marriages in the United States were between spouses with a different race or ethnicity from each other.
- Hispanics are the youngest major racial or ethnic group in the United States.
- Overview and Background.
- By Gretchen Livingston and Anna Brown.
Less than 3 percent of all marriages were interracial in , and the public generally disapproved of such unions. Interracial marriage was even illegal in at least 15 U. Although the U. Supreme Court ruled that laws prohibiting interracial marriages were unconstitutional in , a reported 72 percent of southern white Americans and 42 percent of northern whites said they supported an outright ban on interracial relationships.
Not surprisingly, this transformation is most evident among young people. As the education and income gaps between racial and ethnic groups shrank, so did the social distance between them. While racial discrimination is still evident, the boundaries separating the major ethnic and racial groups have become more porous.
A recent survey found that young Americans ages 18 to 29 have nearly universal acceptance of interracial dating and marriage within their own families. Older Americans are not as tolerant: About 55 percent of those ages 50 to 64 and just 38 percent of those 65 or older said they would not mind if a family member married someone of another race. Most people appear willing to date outside their race, but they still state preferences.
A recent study of profiles submitted to the online dating website Match. But most Americans marry someone of the same race. And, as sociologist Dan Lichter points out, the biggest increase appears to be within minority groups.
White Americans still mostly marry other whites. Source: Paul Taylor et al. Interestingly, although younger people were more accepting of intermarriage, the Pew report found little difference in actual intermarriage rates by age—newlyweds age 50 or older were about as likely to marry out as younger newlyweds.
Only 11 percent of intermarriages were between black and white Americans, reflecting the persistent cultural resistance against relationships between these races. Most common were marriages between a white and a Hispanic 41 percent , followed by marriage between a white and an Asian American 15 percent. These marriages follow similar patterns by sex as interracial marriages of previous decades. For whites, men and women are about as likely to marry a Hispanic, but differ in their rates of marriage to blacks and Asians see Figure 2.
Unions between Asians and whites are also very sex-selective, with most marriages occurring between white men and Asian women. Although Asian men are much less likely to marry out than Asian women, they are much more likely than whites to intermarry. Twenty percent of Asian men married a non-Asian in , compared with 40 percent of Asian women.
Likewise, black women are much less likely to intermarry than black men. More than one-fifth of black men intermarried in , while just 9 percent of black women did. There has been much speculation about why these gender preferences exist—reasons that delve into racial stereotypes and politics.
Hispanic men and women are about as likely to marry outside their ethnic group, and they tend to marry non-Hispanic whites more than other groups. The likelihood of choosing a marriage partner of another race or ethnic group is also influenced by the available pool of people of the appropriate age and with a similar educational background, because most people marry someone close in age and educational level.
This partly explains why U. Both white and black Americans have plenty of potential partners within their own groups. Asians, on the other hand, make up only about 4 percent of the U. And they are the group most likely to marry out.
Nearly 31 percent of Asians marrying in had a non-Asian spouse, about the same percentage as in This demographic change has other effects: Foreign-born Asians are less likely to marry out than U. For the same reasons, intermarriage by Hispanics has declined since About one-quarter of Hispanic men and women married non-Hispanics in But the Pew report already documented a recent uptick in intermarriage among Hispanics and Asians, as immigration has slowed and the proportion of Hispanics and Asians who were born in the United States has grown.
Will the more tolerant attitudes people express toward intermarriage be matched by actual intermarriage rates? There are many reasons to expect continued increases in intermarriage in coming decades. One prime reason is that the population is becoming increasingly diverse—culturally, ethnically, and racially. Americans reaching marriage age over the next two decades are probably the most racially diverse generation ever, and it will be surprising if they do not intermarry more often than previous generations.
About 44 percent of the population under age 18 in was Hispanic, black, Asian, or another non-white group, compared with about 35 percent of the total U.
In addition, more Americans have personal experience with intermarriages involving their families, friends, and work colleagues, which lends a normalcy to these unions. The Pew survey reported that one-third of respondents said they had a family member married to someone of another race or ethnic group.
Pool of Potential Spouses a Factor The likelihood of choosing a marriage partner of another race or ethnic group is also influenced by the available pool of people of the appropriate age and with a similar educational background, because most people marry someone close in age and educational level. Will Intermarriages Increase? References Glenn T. Tsunokai, Augustine J. Kposowa, and Michele A. Paul Taylor et al. Jeffrey M.
While the gender gap among Asian immigrants has remained relatively stable, the gap among the U. Rhonin says:. The article says that in the future these mixed people might identify with hispanic or asian again like the irish did in the 80s. Anybody who intermaries with white or black their children usually claim white or black. Le estimated that among Asian Americans of the 1. It may be the case that marrying at older ages decreased the chance of divorce for this cohort.
Latinos and ethnic marriage statistics. Navigation menu
His dad was white so Bob Marley is actually just a dark skinned white man. The book of Numbers chapter 15 tells you this I am not sure what verse.
For a while in many places, fully half the Asian females raised in the US married non-Asians, mostly whites. If anything, I see lower income Asians under pressure to marry Asians of their same ethnicity, in order to prevent alienating the uneducated parents. An exception would be Filipinos, where women from poor families are encouraged to marry whites. I had a co worker who kept trying to hook me up with her friend. Both my co-worker and her friend were Chinese immigrants.
It felt more like she was making a business proposition to me than set up a date. She kept telling me all the girls accomplishments, Masters in Mechanical Engineering etc.
Your observation in your rocks do not constitute a report joey Even now, living as an expat Hispanic American in Thailand, certain things are very apparent. Aside from any fact that only a small portion of Thais will actually date or marry a foreigner, those that do, will almost always explicitly only go with a white person as they consider everyone else to be of lower status. Going with whites only actually goes for either poorer Thai women but most especially the rich hi-so ones.
I agree with you Joey The women who come from the nations located in Far East Asia, and South East Asia are probably the most racist bigots in the world when it comes to dating Black men.
The majority are to hate filled to even consider such a thing. They nearly exclusively prefer White men. I tend to worship God! Perhaps from your extremely limited view that may be true, but I am willing to bet that the overwhelming majority of Asian-American women from all social classes marry Asian-American men. I notice that Asians who are proud of being Asian are the ones that marry another Asian.
In California we have many Filipinos, Chinese , Vietnamese in interracial marriages. I think this creates identity problems for their kids later in life. That is the dumbest and most ignorant comment. Asians make up a relatively low population in the US and the ratio of Asian women to Asian men are uneven which may lead to dating outside their race. Not that many Asian women intermix. If anything Asisns parents rich or poor do not want their kids intermixing.
There are a lot of white westerners that fly to Asia to take advantage of poor and uneducated Asian females. One couple is funny. He found a recent nurse graduate in the Phils. She is way out of his league. He is a lucky dude. They adore white skin, and the White race, mostly those of Northern European descent such as Germanics, and Celts, although they dont think Whites are above them. To them, Whites are the second-best race in the world.
The East Asian groups mentioned above are the most racist ethnic groups on Earth, even more so than the Arabs [see how they treat Black people], and definitely far more racist than your typical White person. All other racial groups are considered maggots to them. Just spend some time in Koreatown here in L. Half of Asian women marry out? I mean the stats are provided in a link… That study is from and from more recent articles the numbers have already begun to reverse as Asian American men continue to accumulate wealth and become taller through better nutrition.
At times he can literally sit there and say nothing and women will gush over him. I remember one time a girl pretended to be wasted and tripped on herself so she could fall into his arms.
Its was really insane…. The largest correlation on whether any particular person will marry another race is on the percent of his own race he knows. I have to agree with you regarding education and marriage. I can only speak from experience — but when I met my wife Vietnamese she was 1 of only 3 students in her entire high school class that passed the test to go to University in Hanoi. All the other students were only permitted to attend college 2 years.
But as I said, this is only 1 experience — not a collective. I can trace my family roots to Italy and Spain. Not sure why the Government is trying to create another human race? You nailed it! Which is why everyone else is included and passes. And why the rest look down on those with African ancestry. A Hispanic is a person from, or a descendant of, people from the ancient land of Hispania, the Latin name for what is now Spain and Portugal. This is a White group. I agree. People from Hispania, are Hispanics.
So, we are talking about Caucasian people, being tagged as a different race in the United States. This is article however exact, is proof that soon the white race will be eliminated. Someday the people who built and invented everything around you will vanish because of this. Just do the math, the world will become Mestizo, Mulatto and Muslims and Asians and mixed peoples. But we do see some cases where an Anglo and a Latino or Latina get married and the kids are classified as Hispanic so that they can get the benefits of being a protected minority group member.
Easier admission to college, special set-asides in hiring, etc. Now if the Chinese women would quit stealing the available Jewish professional men…. Makes me want to date Goy…. The article says that in the future these mixed people might identify with hispanic or asian again like the irish did in the 80s.
The problem with that is that the irish mixed in predominately with other north europeans and if they didnt could claim other ancestry, their grand children could feel irish even though they may have been mixed with other north europeans.
In the U. A third generation mixed asian child could have more european ancestors and therefore feel white. A third generation mixed hispanic would feel as hispanic as a dutch-french-italian person would feel italian. The dominate cultural and racial ethnicities in the U. Anybody who intermaries with white or black their children usually claim white or black. For example many children with black fathers and white mothers identify as black even though their technically both.
This could be because of the father figure, the hometown his predominately black or the fact that it is culturaly chic to be black in U. Black and white are like peacock Colorful!! I am white and I would like to date a black man. I have always wanted to date a black man, i love black people, My dream when I was young was to go to Africa to meet black people and a boy friend.
There were no black people in my country in South America. Now I am old. Hispanics are not necessarily white. They can be as ethnically mixed as Central Europeans e. Latinos is a much better term than hispanics, because it says that the person has a Spanish or Portuguese speaking ancestry. And with integration this is a different matter.
An in-law-niece of mine Asian; graduated nurse emigrated to the US a couple of years ago with her husband and two young kids kindergarten-age. Once there it was decided to integrate in rapid speed and this meant that with immediate effect English was the only spoken language in the family, especially with the kids. Of course the whole family are US citizens in the meantime. Meaning: When one wants to radically integrate under all circumstances and mainly forget the own heritage too the person can do so quite quickly, the younger one is the better.
Because this has nothing to do with integration per se. My wife and I are in a mixed relationship too and if we would have a child we would have brought it up in three languages from the very beginning: my mother-tongue, her mother-tongue and English. Central Europeans are not racially mixed. Central Europeans are people like Austrians and Germans.
I like my white people, white — my black people, black — and my asian people, asian. You can go to reddit and look up Hapas to confirm the effects of White-Asian intermarriages and assimilation.
Asians and Hispanics are subjected to racism from some people in the White majority whether at school, work, or in public. There is simply no incentive to claim your Asian or Hispanic heritage if it only invites more racism. When racism against Native Americans was high then nobody claimed they were part Native American but just went with the flow and called themselves White.
In other words, distancing yourselves from your original Asian, Hispanic, Native American ancestors is simply voluntary ethnic cleansing. Maybe some hapas call themselves white. I identify with both. I love both of my parents and would never exclude one from me by identifying myself as only one race.
So what you are saying is that two white people, one who speaks only French, and the other who speaks only Polish, it is ok for them to get married because it is not a mixed marriage? Feel free to swap out as two blacks, one that speaks only English and the other that speaks only French or any number of combinations. In science and engineering, you run into a lot of them, and many are open to becoming friends. When I was in college STEM , there was about an equal number of Asian women as white women, but about half the white women were lesbians.
My parents are from Mexico, i was born in California. My girlfriend who i met in high school and have 3 kids together is from the Philippines. We chose to date not because of economic status, or anything political, rather because we were different from each other and we were curious. Were proud of our decisions. Now, our home seems like a speech institute for the fact that we both speak 4 different languages combined, as for our kids, they speak languages.
Intermarriage in my town in very common. Hispanic is NOT a race. Hispanics can be of any race…vast majority of Hispanics are Caucasian. Living in California does not feel like living in a majority White state because most of the Hispanics here do not look White.
You gather random Mexican Americans for example and than gather random Polish Americans and it would be extremely easy to tell the two groups apart just on phenotype alone. Whether we like it or not, mixed Marriages are the thing of the future. I have dated White, Black, Latina and Asian.
Beware of someone who just wants a green card, or just wants to live in a better country. It is sad to see this happening. We should be celebrating the uniqueness of the different people of Earth, not blending each other away into some non descript mud brown people. Diversity destroys the uniqueness of all races. Genghis con tried to diversify his empire and it destroyed him.
Diversity destroys nations, and the uniqueness of all people. Interracial marriage should be avoided like the plague. Thanks for providing a good example of stupidity. One of my friends did that. His grandparents lost a lot of their Japanese heritage during WWII when they were sent to internment camps. When he grew up he studied Japanese and can now speak it better than they can. Mixed marriages are not causing integration, idiots.
Those groups are simply more like whites to begin with and are therefore more likely to marry them. The dorky intellectual white guy is the one who marries an Asian. But whites are diverse genetically. He was killed at the age of 27 in World War II. I guess there are many mixes besides Chinese and Caucasian.
Most Hispanics are not White, most are racially Mixed. In the birth rate for Hispanics was 96 per , compared with 69 for Blacks and 57 for Whites. Given the multiple countries of origin, there is much within-group variation under the label "Hispanic" or "Latino. For example, a "tortilla" is circular flat bread made of corn or flour, but in Puerto Rico, a "tortilla" is an omelet.
In Bolivia, babies are called "huahuas; in Chile, babies are known as "guaguas. There are a number of traditional beliefs about family relationships among Hispanics. Most of these beliefs overlap with philosophies of marriage and roles within the marital relationship. The extent to which Hispanics identify with or accept these cultural norms or mores, however, may depend on their country of origin and their level of acculturation and assimilation to the U.
For instance, integration with American mainstream culture may weaken adherence to traditional Hispanic cultural views for second- or third-generation Hispanics born in the United States.
Marriage in the Hispanic culture is often seen in a familial context-extending beyond the nucleus of the married couple. Familial relationships are regarded more highly than the marital relationship. Family needs go before personal needs. A wife is often evaluated by her conformity to these values. A wife is expected to enforce tradition, morality, and religious values, as well as run the household and rear the children. The number of inter-ethnic marriages among Hispanics increased from , in to 2,, in The majority of inter-ethnic marriages are between Hispanics and Whites.
Unfortunately, there is little research to explain why this is the case. Hispanics with less than a high school education are far less likely Whites to divorce. In contrast, Hispanics with post-high school education are more likely than Whites to divorce. Hispanics are slightly less likely to cohabit than Whites.
Transcript and audio-cast of the September seminar are available. This is a statewide survey which includes a large Hispanic sample. Survey findings report on attitudes toward marriage, living arrangements, and interest in marriage education. Nov Landale and R.
1. Trends and patterns in intermarriage | Pew Research Center
Using data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth NLSY79 , this article examines marriages and divorces of young baby boomers born during the — period. The article presents data on marriages and divorces by age, gender, race, and Hispanic origin, as well as by educational attainment. Many changes in the last half century have affected marriage and divorce rates. Cultural norms changed in ways that decreased the aversion to being single and increased the probability of cohabitation.
Using the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth NLSY79 —a survey of people born during the — period—this study examines the marriage and divorce patterns for a cohort of young baby boomers up to age In particular, the study focuses on differences in marriage and divorce patterns by educational attainment and by age at marriage.
This work is descriptive and does not attempt to explain causation or why marriage patterns differ across groups. About 85 percent of the NLSY79 cohort married by age 46, and among those who married, a sizeable fraction, almost 30 percent, married more than once. The bulk of marriages occurred by age 28, with relatively few marriages taking place at age 35 or older.
Approximately 42 percent of marriages that took place between ages 15 and 46 ended in divorce by age In the NLSY79, women in this cohort were more likely to marry and to remarry than were men. In addition, marriages of women were more likely to end in divorce, as were marriages that began at younger ages. On average, women married at younger ages than men. Marriage patterns differed markedly by age at marriage and by educational attainment. College-educated men and women married at older ages compared with their counterparts who had fewer years of schooling.
About equal proportions of men and women who received a college degree married by age 46, 88 percent for men and 90 percent for women. Men and women who did not complete high school were less likely to marry than were men and women with more education. The chance of a marriage ending in divorce was lower for people with more education, with over half of marriages of those who did not complete high school having ended in divorce compared with approximately 30 percent of marriages of college graduates.
In their study, Betsey Stevenson and Justin Wolfers used data from the Survey of Income and Program Participation SIPP to examine marriage and divorce patterns up to age 45 for cohorts born in — and — Stevenson and Wolfers found stark differences in marriage patterns between racial groups and between education groups for the — birth cohort: Blacks married later and at lower rates compared with Whites.
College graduates and those with less education married at approximately the same rates, but college graduates married later at age The probability of divorce for those with a college degree was lower compared with those without a college degree.
College graduates were 10 percentage points less likely to divorce. The trends of declining marriage rates and increasing divorce rates, shown by Stevenson and Wolfers, continue with the — NLSY79 cohort.
While the marriage rate for the NLSY79 cohort fell to In addition, though the rate of divorce rose to The National Longitudinal Survey of Youth is particularly well suited for studying marriage and divorce patterns. The NLSY79 is a nationally representative sample of men and women who were ages 14 to 22 when they were first interviewed in Respondents were interviewed annually until , and since then they have continued to be interviewed on a biennial basis.
The NLSY79 collects detailed information on fertility, marital transitions, and employment in a format that allows one to determine the dating of the specific events. Because the NLSY79 contains a longitudinal marital history for each respondent, the survey permits the study of marriage and divorce over the life cycle. For a specific cohort, the NLSY79 can provide statistics on the percentage of marriages that end in divorce. In contrast, official statistics on marriage and divorce rates from Vital Statistics Records are based on counts of marriages and divorces reported by the states from registration records.
The rates are calculated by dividing the marriage and divorce totals by population estimates from the decennial census. These rates tell us what percentage of the U. For instance, by estimating the relationships among marriage, divorce, work effort, and wage rates, researchers found that being married and having high earnings reinforce each other over time. In our research for this article, we use data collected through , which is when the youngest of the sample members were age At each interview, NLSY79 respondents report whether their marital status has changed since the date of their last interview.
Respondents who have experienced a change in marital status are asked to list each change and report the type and date of that change. Using these reports, NLS staff calculates start dates for the first through third marriages and end dates if any for the first and second marriages. In the same way, we use the respondent reports on type and date of marital change to create start and end dates for additional marriages. One issue that arises in creating a history of marital changes is the treatment of marital separations.
In some instances, respondents report a separation prior to divorce. However, in other instances, respondents report a transition from marriage directly to divorce. Separations are ignored in both the creation of these variables by survey staff and our work in classifying the termination of higher order marriages.
Divorce and widowhood are classified as the termination of marriage. The sample criteria used in this study require that a sample member participated in an NLSY79 interview at age 45 or older, reported valid dates for the start and any end of all marriages, and reported his or her highest grade completed in round 9 or a later round of data collection.
The most recent report of highest grade completed is used to classify respondents on the basis of educational attainment. This study examines marriage and divorce patterns among people between the ages of 15 and 46 using a sample of 7, men and women who had 8, marriages during those ages. The data are weighted using custom weights that make the sample used in the study statistically representative of the population from which the NLSY79 was drawn.
Tables 1 and 2 provide some information about the sample composition. The sample is composed of about 51 percent men and 49 percent women. Non-Black non-Hispanics make up almost 80 percent of the sample, with Blacks and Hispanics composing the remainder at 14 percent and 7 percent, respectively.
The data used in this study, however, are weighted such that the sample employed is representative of those born in the years — and living in the United States in Note: The National Longitudinal Survey of Youth consists of men and women who were born in the years — and were ages 14 to 22 when first interviewed in These individuals were ages 45 to 52 in — Race and Hispanic or Latino ethnicity groups are mutually exclusive.
Educational attainment is as of the most recent survey. We provide additional detail on the composition of the subgroups by educational attainment because the subsequent tables show that marital outcomes are strongly related to educational attainment. The data used in this study are weighted such that the sample employed is representative of those born in the years — and living in the United States in The educational attainment of women exceeds that of men to a small extent.
Compared with the percentage of men, a slightly smaller percentage of women fall into the two lowest education groups less than a high school diploma and high school graduate, no college. Several trends that emerged from the — to the — birth cohorts continued with the NLSY79 cohort. By age 46, Both men and women delayed first marriage, with the age of first marriage rising to ages In addition, a larger proportion of marriages ended in divorce, approximately Overall, a smaller percentage Three out of ten Black non-Hispanics born during — did not marry by the age of 46, while the same statistic for Whites remained close to the 1-in ratio seen in the earlier cohorts.
That is, the proportion ever married among Blacks decreased from The percentage of Black non-Hispanics who have ever divorced is lower than that of Whites or of Hispanics, reflecting the smaller percentage of Black non-Hispanics who marry. Conditional on having ever married, a larger percentage of Blacks have divorced. As with first marriage, reentry into marriage among Black non-Hispanics was less common than among Whites.
Hispanics marry at a younger age. Notably, the differences in marriage and divorce patterns across education groups are larger in the NLSY79 than those reported for the — birth cohort. In contrast, in the — birth cohort, there was no difference in the marriage rate of the college educated compared with those who have less than a college degree.
In the NLSY79, the average age at first marriage was In contrast, in the — birth cohort, college graduates married at age The gap is even greater, approaching 30 percentage points, when comparing those with a college degree to those with less than a high school diploma.
Just as with first marriages, college graduates were more likely to stay in a second marriage when compared with groups that have less education. Further disaggregating the sample by both education and gender, table 4 shows notable differences between men and women who had the same level of education. However, at all lower levels of education, women are more likely to marry compared with men. For men, the probability of marriage increases with education. Among women, those who did not complete high school are less likely to marry compared with women of all higher education levels.
However, in contrast to the situation for men, there is little difference in the propensity to marry among women with at least a high school degree. Historically, college-educated women had been less likely to marry compared with less educated women. At each level of educational attainment, men marry later compared with women. Although both men and women with a college education delay first marriage compared with their counterparts who have less than a high school diploma, for women the average length of the delay is 5 years, compared with almost 3 years for men.
For both men and women, the probability of divorce declines with educational attainment. The gradient, however, is steeper for men than it is for women. For men, those who married and only completed high school are 25 percentage points more likely to divorce than are their counterparts who have a college degree.
In contrast, this difference is roughly half as large for women. The key to this difference is that college-educated men and women who marry divorce at different rates, with about a quarter of college-educated men divorcing compared with 35 percent of women.
Just as men with more education were more likely to get married a first time than were men with less education, men with more education were more likely to remarry after their first divorce. For women who have divorced, the propensity to remarry did not increase with education. It is also interesting to note that men with a college education were much more likely to remain in their second marriages 85 percent relative to women with the same amount of education The data in table 5 show how marital status evolved with age.
At age 15, virtually none of the respondents have married. By age 25, less than half of the respondents have never married, 44 percent are in their first marriage and 8 percent had a first marriage that ended.
When they are 10 years older, at age 35, less than 20 percent have never married, 55 percent are in their first marriage, 11 percent had their first marriage end but have not remarried, and 11 percent are in their second marriage.